Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Hugh Grant Still Signed On For Bridget Jones' Diary Three

    Hugh Grant Still Signed On For Bridget Jones' Diary Three

    Fans of the 'Bridget Jones Diary' movies can breathe a sigh of relief because Hugh Grant is still a part of the film, despite recent reports suggesting otherwise.

    Dismissing the rumours that Hugh had dropped out of playing Daniel Cleaver for the third time, the BBC reports Working Title chairman, Tim Bevan as saying:

    "Reports that Hugh Grant has exited Bridget Jones's Baby are untrue."

    Admitting that work on the script has delayed production, Tim added: "We are still working on the script, hence the delay to the start of production, but the film is going ahead as planned."

    Despite signing up for a third movie, Hugh spoke of his uncertainty of reprising his role in 2009, telling the BBC:

    "I think Bridget Jones two was a mistake, to be honest with you. It wasn't a very good script and I resisted it for a long time, so did Colin and so did Renee. And we got kind of conned into making it."

    What do you think?

    Hugh poses for pictures with fans

    VIDEO: Watch Madonna's Video For 'Give Me All Your Lovin'
    Lady Gaga Lashes Out At Cruel Twitter Taunts
    LucyJo Hudson Defends Dramatic Weight Loss: 'I'm Healthier And Fitter Than Ever'
    QR code
     

    3 comments

    • rocknrollmum  •  3 months ago
      I liked both films. Maybe the story of the first one was better but the second one was still fun.
      The three of them make a great team and I shall look forward to the third film.
    • Michael  •  Doncaster, England  •  3 months ago
      'I think Bridget Jones two was a mistake, to be honest with you. It wasn't a very good script and I resisted it for a long time, so did Colin and so did Renee. And we got kind of conned into making it."
      Bollocks. No one conned him into doing anything. His 'acting' role of playing Hugh Grant - Type No.34* was done for the same reason as always......money. Still, agree with him about the movie. The first one was pretty good but the sequel stank.
    • VANESSA B  •  Aberdeen, Scotland  •  3 months ago
      Don.t bother